Comparing the camera shot styles of video lectures: Close-up versus broad framing of whiteboard and lecturer
Many educational organizations are motivated to create and share instructional videos, but there are no
guidelines about the presentation styles. In practice, the presentation style of video lectures ranges from simple video
capturing of classroom teaching, up to highly elaborate authoring of video presentations that include close-ups and video-cuts
of instructors, slides, animations, and interactive drawing boards. In particular, there is limited research about the effects
of each presentation style on student learning performance and attitudes. In this work, we examine the effects of video
presentation styles in supporting the teaching of mathematics in the secondary education. In addition to a control group that
studied through a paper-book, two groups of students attended two distinct styles of video lectures: 1) video capture of class
teaching (Talking head style), and 2) close-up video capture of an interactive drawing board with voice-over (Khan style). The
participants of our study consisted of 36 students (15 boys and 21 girls, 16 years old), who received the respective three
treatments (paper book, talking head, khan style), over the course of three math modules in three weeks’ time. We found that
learning effects show up only after the second week and that the Talking Head style was more effective than the book for
complex topics.
PDF
Ilioudi, C., Chorianopoulos, K., and Giannakos, M.N. 2013. Comparing the camera shot styles of video lectures: Close-up versus broad framing of whiteboard and lecturer. 7th International Conference in Open and Distance Learning 2013, 1–7.BibTeX
Ilioudi, C., Chorianopoulos, K., and Giannakos, M.N. 2013. Comparing the camera shot styles of video lectures: Close-up versus broad framing of whiteboard and lecturer. 7th International Conference in Open and Distance Learning 2013, 1–7.